Pricing

Priced per machine. Justified per tonne.

A single avoided web break on a fast containerboard machine can pay for a month of the Machine tier. We would rather you started with one machine and one number than with a mill-wide programme and a business case nobody believes.

From $16,000 / machine / mo18% annual discountOutcome components available

run_8f21c4 · agent graph · PM4 10 nodes · 1 approval gate
01 · orchestrator ingest.grade_target ✓ SUCCEEDED 02 · orchestrator twin.simulate ✓ SUCCEEDED 03 · pulp_stock stock.refine ✓ SUCCEEDED 04 · wetend_chem wetend.dose ✓ SUCCEEDED 05 · form_press form.headbox ✓ SUCCEEDED 06 · form_press press.nip ✓ SUCCEEDED 07 · dry_coat dry.steam ✓ SUCCEEDED 08 · defect_inspect inspect.web ✓ SUCCEEDED 09 · orchestrator approve.human ◆ APPROVAL 10 · quality_conf reel.qualify ✓ SUCCEEDED

Live example: Grade change PM4 · 135 gsm kraftliner → 110 gsm testliner, no break, ≤14 min off-spec

Pricing

Priced per machine, per mill, per group

Land on one workflow with a measurable baseline. Expand by machine, module and autonomy level. Outcome components available on broke, breaks and energy.

Billing period
Machine $16,000 per paper machine / month · billed monthly

Wet-end, forming and drying control or web inspection for a single machine. For mills validating ROI on the wedge.

  • One machine, one agent module
  • Mill-edge inference node included
  • QCS + DCS read, guarded write
  • Run log, audit trail, reel genealogy
  • Business-hours support
Start a pilot
Enterprise Custom land $700k – $9M ACV

Multi-site groups standardising on Pulpum, with custom grade, furnish and tolerance models.

  • Multi-site fleet management
  • Custom grade / furnish / tolerance models
  • Mill edge fleet with air-gapped option
  • Group autonomy policy and approval chains
  • SLAs, SSO/SCIM, dedicated engineer
Contact us
Compare

What is in each plan

Modules are licensed per machine on the Machine tier and bundled on Mill and Enterprise.

What is in each plan
CapabilityMachineMillEnterprise
Machines covered1All on siteAll in group
Agent modules1 of 9All 9All 9 + custom
As-run digital twin—IncludedCustom models
Mill-edge nodeIncludedPer machineFleet managed
Guarded DCS writesScoped tagsAll scoped tagsGroup policy
Reel genealogyIncludedIncludedIncluded + export API
Autonomy levelsL1–L2L1–L3L1–L4 [ASPIRATIONAL]
SSO / SCIM / RBAC—SSOSSO + SCIM + tag RBAC
Air-gapped deployment—OptionalIncluded
SupportBusiness hours24/724/7 + named engineer
Model reviewAnnualQuarterlyQuarterly per machine
Indicative price$16,000/mo$95,000/mo$700k–$9M ACV
Run timeline

What you are actually buying

A run engine that produces this record on every transition, every shift, on every machine you license.

run_8f21c4 PM4 · 6.8 m trim · 1,180 m/min SUCCEEDED
  1. 01 ingest.grade_target SUCCEEDED 0.8 s

    Mill Orchestrator — Pulled the 110 gsm testliner spec, customer tolerances and the standing energy budget from mill MES; locked the target envelope for the run.

  2. 02 twin.simulate SUCCEEDED 34 s

    Mill Orchestrator — Simulated 48 candidate transition recipes on the as-run paper-machine twin — forming, press, dryer and calender — and ranked them on off-spec tonnes, break risk and steam.

  3. 03 stock.refine SUCCEEDED 2 m 10 s

    Pulp-and-Stock — Stepped refiner specific edge load 1.9 → 1.4 Ws/m and pushed freeness toward 412 CSF while consistency held at 3.4%.

  4. 04 wetend.dose SUCCEEDED 1 m 26 s

    Wetend-and-Chemistry — Retention aid trimmed to 214 g/t and sizing to 1.1 kg/t against live charge and turbidity; first-pass retention recovered to 78% inside 90 seconds.

  5. 05 form.headbox SUCCEEDED 1 m 05 s

    Form-and-Press — Re-cut the slice profile across 78 actuators and set jet-to-wire to 0.994 to hold formation index through the basis-weight ramp.

  6. 06 press.nip SUCCEEDED 48 s

    Form-and-Press — Nip load reduced 620 → 540 kN/m to protect the lighter web; post-press dryness landed at 47.1%.

  7. 07 dry.steam SUCCEEDED 3 m 18 s

    Dry-and-Coat — Re-phased the steam schedule across 6 dryer groups and rebalanced the hood; reel moisture converged to 7.4% ±0.19 2σ at 6.1% less steam than the standing recipe.

  8. 08 inspect.web SUCCEEDED continuous

    Defect-and-Inspect — 18 line-scan cameras streaming; two edge-crack precursors detected at the drive side and cleared by a 40 kN/m nip trim before either propagated.

  9. 09 approve.human APPROVAL 52 s

    Mill Orchestrator — Speed ramp 1,180 → 1,245 m/min exceeded the site autonomy threshold. Held for the machine tender; approved by J. Okonkwo at 04:57:12.

  10. 10 reel.qualify SUCCEEDED 1 m 31 s

    Quality-and-Conformance — Reel R-24188 released: full genealogy written (furnish, chemistry, CD profiles, defect map, operator actions) and checked against grade spec.

Packaging

Land, expand, monetise the value

The pricing model follows the deployment model rather than fighting it.

  1. Land low-friction

    One machine, one workflow, one number. The entry point is deliberately small enough to sign without a board paper.

  2. Prove against your baseline

    Results are reconciled against the mill's own historian data, not our telemetry. If the number does not move, you do not expand.

  3. Expand by module

    Add agents along the machine — inspection, then drying, then profile — as each one clears its own gate.

  1. Expand by machine and site

    The second machine deploys faster than the first; the second mill faster than the second machine.

  2. Expand by autonomy

    Advisory to supervised to bounded. The site decides the pace; the price does not change with the level.

  3. Monetise the outcome

    For broke, break minutes and energy we will price part of the value directly, against an agreed baseline.

ROI

The arithmetic mills actually run

Indicative for a 400,000 t/yr containerboard machine. Substitute your own numbers — we will do this with your historian data during the mill review. [ASPIRATIONAL model]

Annual value at the Machine tier

  • 9 avoided breaks/month × 3.5 equivalent hours = 378 hours of production recovered
  • 6% less dryer steam on 2.4 GJ/t across 400,000 t = 57,600 GJ
  • 3.6 t less off-spec per grade change × 11 changes/week = 2,060 t
  • Additive spend down 11% on the wet-end chemistry budget
  • Claims and non-conformances reduced by roughly half
  • Against $192,000/yr for the Machine tier at list price
Measured

What the pilot measures

The four numbers we agree up front and report against [ASPIRATIONAL].

11 m 42 s Grade change on PM4 · baseline 19 m 05 s
6.2 t Off-spec tonnes per transition · baseline 9.8 t
68% Web breaks predicted more than 90 s early
7.9% Less dryer steam per tonne of paper

Figures are design targets and pilot-scoped results [ASPIRATIONAL]. Every number is reproduced from the mill's own reel genealogy, not our telemetry.

Use cases

Which plan fits

A quick sort.

Machine SUCCEEDED

One machine, one wedge

You have a specific, expensive problem on one machine — usually breaks or dryer energy — and you want a number before a programme.

Mill RUNNING

The full loop on one site

You have proven the wedge and want stock, chemistry, forming, drying, profile, yield and handling working as one system with the twin.

Enterprise WAITING

A group standardising

Multiple mills, a group-level variance problem, and a need for one policy model, one audit format and comparable benchmarks.

Pilot QUEUED

Not sure yet

A paid 90 to 120 day deployment on one machine with an agreed baseline and a defined exit. Fees credit against year one.

Guardrails

An agent that can move a nip needs a leash

Pulpum writes to production equipment. Every capability is scoped, every write is policy-checked, and every action is written to an append-only audit log the mill owns.

  • Bounded action space. Each agent can only write to an explicit tag allow-list, inside per-tag rate and magnitude limits.
  • Policy engine before every write. Autonomy level, shift, grade, interlock state and operator presence are all evaluated before a setpoint moves.
  • Human-in-the-loop gates. Anything above the site threshold — speed ramps, grade releases, safety-adjacent moves — waits for a named approver.
  • Immutable audit log. Append-only, hash-chained, exportable, and retained on the mill's own storage.
  • Hard fallback. Loss of the edge node, the network or the model returns control to the DCS's last known-good state within one scan cycle.
  • Tenant and IP isolation. Furnish recipes, grade models and defect libraries never cross a customer boundary. On-prem deployment available.

Compliance posture

Compliance and certification status
StandardScopeStatus
SOC 2 Type IICloud control plane RUNNING In progress [ASPIRATIONAL]
ISO 27001Company-wide ISMS QUEUED Planned [ASPIRATIONAL]
IEC 62443Mill-edge OT security RUNNING Design-aligned
GDPROperator data SUCCEEDED Compliant
ISO 9001 / FSCQuality + chain of custody records SUCCEEDED Supported

Read the security overview

From the control room

What machine tenders say

Autonomy earns trust one shift at a time. These are design-partner quotes from pilot deployments [ASPIRATIONAL].

"The first thing that convinced the crew wasn't the control — it was the log. You can scroll back and see exactly why it dropped the nip. Nobody argues with a timestamp."

Machine tender · PM4 · Nordkraft Mills

"We had two people who could do a clean 135-to-110 transition. One retired in March. The twin now does the sequencing and the second one supervises it."

Production manager · Aurora Board

"Break prediction was the wedge. Ninety seconds of warning is the difference between a nip trim and four hours of threading."

Process engineer · Ternvik Paper
Enterprise

Standardise autonomy across the group

One policy model, one audit trail, one benchmark across every machine in every mill — with the grade and furnish models kept private to each site.

Talk to sales Enterprise details

  • SSO, SCIM and role-based access down to the tag level
  • Group-wide autonomy policy with per-site override and approval chains
  • Cross-mill benchmarking on broke, breaks, steam and first-pass quality
  • VPC, on-prem and fully air-gapped mill-edge deployment options
  • 99.5% control-plane SLA; edge autonomy survives control-plane loss
  • Dedicated deployment engineer and quarterly model review per site
FAQ

Straight answers

The questions mill managers and process engineers actually ask in the first meeting.

One paper machine and one agent module — wet-end, forming and drying control or web inspection — with the mill-edge inference node, QCS and DCS connectivity, guarded writes, the full run log and reel genealogy, at $16,000 per machine per month.

Get started

Start with one machine

Book a mill review. We will look at your break rate, your steam per tonne and your grade-change waste, and tell you which wedge has the shortest payback.